| Overall Rating |
 |
| Description |
| Oddball or refreshingly radical alternative? This large hatchback has executive-class pretensions and an MPV-like interior but only four full-sized. Vel Satis is certainly different, but do we really need it? |
| Handling |
 |
| Comfort |
|
| Quality & Reliability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Roominess |
 |
| Running Costs |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
|
| NCAP |
| 5 |
| Best Models |
| 2.0 T, 2.2 dCi |
| Worst Models |
| 3.5 V6 |
| Replacement |
| 2010 |
|
 |
| Road Test |
| Renault replaced the conventional Safrane with the boldly-styled Vel Satis; it was a brave experiment. It's roomy - although the rear seats are designed for two adults to stretch out in, rather than to seat three - and it's pleasingly designed inside, with well-upholstered seats and trim choices that go beyond the conservative blacks and greys usually offered in this class. It's spoiled by wallowy handling - its high roof gives it almost MPV-like driving dynamics - and the ride is not as cushioned as a French executive car should be. Expensive, it's unlikely to maintain firm used values for long. Renault dealers control virtually all used stock so far, but expect values to crash in the longer term, making it a costly investment. The automatic gearbox is jerky and doesn't work to full advantage with the powerful 3.5 V6 engine. The 2.2 dCi diesel is a better choice - but then you might as well buy a Laguna. |
| Positive Points |
- Attention-grabbing body is roomy with good load space
- Quiet, comfortable and very well equipped
- Very safe
- earned five NCAP stars
|
| Negative Points |
- Not as sharply responsive as German rivals
- Renault lacks credibility in the exec sector
- Expect steep depreciation and resale problems
|
|
Sign In | Sell My Car » 
